Bulova Moon Watch Review 96B251

by Tony Villa 5

bulova_moon_watch_review

4.0

This isn't a Speedmaster on a budget. This is it's own watch, that's worthy to wear its Apollo inscriptions...with pride.

Our Rating:

Tool watch. It’s a term that’s bandied about among watch enthusiasts.

You know, you have your dress watch, and your divers watch, your beater, your chrono, your flieger, lots of different categories that you need to get watches in, in order to have a fully rounded collection.

One of the most popular, is a tool watch.

So what is a tool watch. Simply it’s a watch that is designed to do a certain job. This is a subjective term as surely the job all watches are designed to do is tell the time, so any watch that tells the time can therefore be classed as a tool watch?

No, it’s not that simple. A tool watch has to be focussed. Not showy. Apart from telling the time, the rest of its design and construction has to be singularly focussed on its intended use. Divers watches with a 120 click bezel with lume, minimal face with big lumed indices and big lumed hands are a tool watch. A Rolex Submariner Serti with diamond indices and use of gold isn’t. A tool watch is designed for a specific application, not really for show. This is what makes them desirable, that it has a purpose beyond being wrist candy.

So what does this have to do with this Bulova? Well, it must be said that the “ultimate” tool watches are ones that were designed for the harshest, yet coolest, applications. Pilots watches, racing timers and coolest of all…astronaut watches.

You think space / moon watch; you think of The Omega Speedmaster. It’s well documented that these were the watches independently chosen by NASA as standard issue to astronauts from the Mercury programme onwards. These are what were on the wrists of heroes like Neil Armstrong and Wally Schirra. The back of some models has the inscription “Flight Qualified By NASA For Use On All Manned Space Missions”. You can’t really get cooler than that.

But there were other watches used on manned missions, that NASA wasn’t aware of at the time, sneaked on-board by their astronaut owners. One was the Seiko 6139. The orange dialled version is called the “Pogue” as it was worn by William Pogue on the Skylab 4 mission. The other is a one off Bulova chronograph watch made for Dave Scott, that he wore on The Moon during the Apollo 15 mission.

I won’t go into details about that original watch (as a quick Google will fill you in) except to say that the original sold for a fortune at auction in 2015 and seeing that, Bulova decided it wanted a bit of the “space watch” pie.

So it has come out with a re-issue of Scott’s Moon Watch. I guess the first thing to do is look at them side by side (picture wise, I couldn’t afford the original)image1

image2

The case, the crown, the hands and the distinctive large chrono pushers are very good homages, it’s clear these are from the same bloodline.

The lume is obviously not the same, but the indices are nicer on the re-issue as they are applied steel with lume and look classier. There is a date window on the re-issue too, the Bulova text is now in its modern incarnation and there is a “262 KHz” marking on the lowest chrono dial.

So, it really does look like the original, however, the movement is very different.

The movement in the re-issue is thoroughly modern. It uses a Prescisionist quartz chronograph movement. “262 KHz” refers to the oscillation of the crystal in the movement. This is much higher than a regular quartz movement. Bulova claims that this is accurate to within 10 seconds per year. If it is or isn’t I’m not sure, but I certainly haven’t noticed much slippage, but I don’t need a watch to be ultra accurate, so I don’t really measure them. However, at least on paper, that is a very accurate movement. Very.

This also means that when using the chronograph function, the dial at 3 O’Clock measures to 1/1000th of a second and the chronograph (large) second hand sweeps as if it was mechanical. Very accurate again, but also looks very cool.

The original had an automatic movement. Even the biggest automatic fan cannot dispute the fact that the prescisionist movement is a lot more accurate and functional than the one in the original watch.

Many have been put off the watch due to the fact that it has this movement instead of an automatic, but here we go back to the “tool watch” musings. In this day and age, this is the right movement. Accurate, useable, not affected by (lack of) gravity or magnetism. And it allows the watch to be in the reach of people who wouldn’t spend what Omega (or Fortis, but that’s for another time) want for a “space watch” with pedigree.

Anyway, here’s some facts and figures, before I go on with my thoughts:

  • Crystal: Sapphire Glass With AR Coating
  • Lume: “Super Luminous”
  • Case Diameter: 45 mm
  • Case Thickness: 13.5 mm
  • Lug Width: 20mm
  • Lug To Lug: 50mm
  • Water Resistance: 50M
  • Textured black leather strap
  • Black nylon strap with a nubuck leather patch that commemorates the date of mission (DOM) as 08021971
  • Gift-box presentation includes a Certificate of Authenticity and strap changing tool
  • UK RRP: £449 (Only really available through Ernest Jones)

image3

So, what’s it like to live with?

Well, I have a 7 ¾” wrist, so I can carry off big watches, but I must admit, the 45 x 50mm size did seem at the top end of what I thought I could get away with.

Also, there are 2 versions, this “limited” edition (by how many I don’t know, but they seem readily available and mine isn’t numbered) with the 2 straps and a version with a bracelet (never seen that for sale in the UK).

I contacted Bulova UK about buying a bracelet separately, but apparently the lugs are drilled differently so the official bracelet will not fit. Which is a shame. I hope they rethink and create a new bracelet for the limited version in the future, but I won’t hold my breath.

So here it is on my wrist on a “Bond” Zulu:

image4

Looks very focussed and “tool” like. This transcends down to the face, which looks plain, but is very easy to read, very nicely done and in its own way, very elegant and beautifully finished.

image5-small-2

image6-small

The straps, got to be honest, not tried them. The carbon effect one that comes with it is nice, with a signed buckle, but I already had in mind what I was going to wear on it before it arrived.

I got a lovely Di Modell Rallye strap, which is what I wear when I want it to look a bit more formal:

image7

The “Bond” for casual, but my fave is a leather NATO with brushed hardware for general wear:

image8

Haven’t seen a bracelet that I think will look good on it. The case is blasted and matte, so any bracelet I do decide to try will have to be matte too and so far, haven’t really seen any.

If I could change one thing, I think it would be the lugs. Although it still looks good, I think for a watch this size, 22mm lugs would have been better, with straight ends, but it’s a minor thing.

Also, as great as the raised crystal is, you knock it and you could crack it easily, which could well ruin the aesthetic of the whole watch (note the signed crown).

image9

The lume is pretty, but the “Super Luminous” doesn’t last long, but this isn’t a divers watch so in reality it’s not a negative. I’m always near a light source if I need to know the time. However, I have a Speedy Mk II and, like this, I love having the Tachy scale under the crystal. However, the Speedy’s is luminous and looks fab in the dark, as you can see, the Bulova’s isn’t:

image10

So, is this a keeper? You know how it is, you see a watch, you research it, you ask opinions, you check the finances, sometimes sell some other pieces and then it turns up…and you just don’t bond. You don’t know why, but you don’t.

Then sometimes you have a passing fancy, read a bit more and think “meh, looks ok, price is right, what the hell, I can always flip it” …and it turns out to be epic.

The latter is for me as regards to this watch. It had hype and coverage, it was hard to get hold of (at the time) and had the space coolness factor so I figured I’d give it a go, as I’d be able to flip it at minimal loss if it wasn’t for me.

I love it when your expectations are low and a watch surpasses it. This is a definite keeper for me. It’s beautifully made and finished, the presentation is top notch, it’s very versatile, has great wrist presence and if anyone asks, it has an impressive story and the etchings on the caseback to back it up:

image11

For the price, I don’t think you can by much better new. And as a tool watch, the only real tool in my case is the one wearing it :)

Wrapping up

We hope you enjoyed this Bulova Moon Watch Review!

If you enjoyed this article, please be sure to share it on social media! If you have any more questions or comments, please leave a comment below.

If you’d like to get alerted when we release new articles like these, then please feel free to sign up to our newsletter using the box in the sidebar on the right hand side, or the one below this post.

Please don't forget to share:

Did you Enjoy this Article?
Sign up to our weekly spam-free newsletter to be the first to read our new content.

It's free and you can unsubscribe at any time!

100% Privacy. We don't spam.

Comments (5)

  1. Hey Tony,

    I bought the metal link version of this watch, and purchased the leather strap separately, which seems to have a really tight fight when I put it on. Wondering if you know if there is any difference in the watch case between leather + velcro version vs metal bracelet version? Thanks.

  2. Yeah,
    The holes are drilled differently between the versions.
    I know because contacted Bulova to see if I could get the bracelet, but they said that it wouldn’t fit my version for reasons.
    My advice is to get some curved spring bars and a strap with curved ends. Di Modell do some good ones.

    Tony

  3. Id I had one complaint is Bulova need SOLAR/ECO for the precisionist line desperately, period! Then Perpetual date keeping and lastly NFC so you can set and track the watch in a smartphone world…

    Then design, bracelets and clasps need a 2020 redesign too

    1. I’m personally not the biggest fan of solar powered, but fair enough!

  4. Liking this alot as I don’t want to spend on a speedmaster for work, but DO need a 12 hour chrono. Looks like the original was 12 hour, but I’m guessing this new version is 60mins?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>